Archive for March, 2011

Mar 30 2011

The Value of SEO

Published by Mike under SEO

SEO drives incremental value in terms of branded search, direct traffic and offline sales.

From our perspective, a well executed search optimisation programme means your website is open for business. I think we all agree that it’s not enough to have a shopping cart, or simply load products to your website.

While most business owners these days have at least some understanding of the importance of Search Engine Optimisation, it can be very easy to under-value the return on investment that SEO provides.

For example, a business that has a chain of bricks and mortar stores, as well as an online store, will most likely use a web analytics package such as Google Analytics to report on the following figures for visitors that were attributed to non-brand natural search:

  • the number of visits
  • the number of sales
  • the revenue that those sales produced

While this is an excellent approach to tracking the direct impact of your SEO activities, does it capture all of the value that SEO returns?

What about Brand Search?

Brand search is usually excluded from SEO reports as the majority of websites already rank very well, usually number one in the search engine results pages (SERPs) for their own brand name. However, ranking well for non-brand terms does help over time to increase the search traffic from brand terms as well.

For example, a customer who searches for non-brand terms such as “46 inch LCD TV” and checks out the first three of four search results, is then quite likely to later return to one or more of those websites by searching for the name of the stores that sell the product. The same person may also continue refining their generic search with product brand names; usually this happens after considering product ratings and reviews.

What about Direct Traffic?

Just as in the example above for brand search, non-brand searchers are also likely to revisit sites that they found with non-brand terms via bookmarks that they saved in their web-browser, or just by remembering the URL of the site and typing it in again.

What about Offline Sales?

Many consumers are still not completely comfortable with making online purchases, or they want to see and touch the physical product before they make the commitment to purchase. This is known as the ROBO effect (Research Online, Buy Offline).

A joint Comscore and Procter & Gamble study found that consumers who search for a product online spend on average 20% more in store and eMarketer has previously reported that every dollar spent online has influenced 3.45 dollars in offline spend.

In Conclusion

While you definitely should be tracking the direct impact that SEO has on your website’s performance, it also pays to keep the bigger picture in mind. SEO may well have an even greater return on investment than you had previously believed.

Related Posts:

No responses yet

Mar 28 2011

Press Coverage: Why you need SEM

Read Mark Baartse, Consulting Director of First Rate’s comments on one of the most important things that you need to know about SEM in this recent .NETT article by Luke Telford.

Every small business wants to get more online exposure for their brand online. This is why SEO is such a competitive industry. Businesses are constantly vying for the number one spot in search listings, but what many don’t know is that there’s more than one way to get there.
A term that is often used interchangably with SEO is SEM, or search engine marketing. SEM is significantly different to SEO, and it’s important for anyone who is trying to improve their search rankings to understand how each of the services can benefit their business in different ways.
Every time someone uses a search engine, they encounter SEM. SEM results are the highlighted links that appear at the top, and in a column to the right of search results. Advertisers pay to appear in the results for specified keywords. When a searcher clicks on their link, the advertiser is charged a commission by the search engine.
Kate Conroy, product specialist for AdWords at Google Australia, explains that SEM is essentially a way for businesses to buy ads or sponsored links on search engines.
“It’s distinct to SEO, which stands for search engine optimisation, which is about making your website more search engine friendly, so that it shows up higher higher in the organic, or free search engine lists,” she explains.
One major benefit to SEM is that it can provide a very quick turnaround in search results.
“SEM can give you immediate results,” explains Mark Baartse, consulting director of First Rate. “[It allows you to] respond a lot faster to changing market conditions, and you can respond a lot better to changing campaigns.”
“One of the most important things about SEM is that it’s a very quick way to get a presence on a search engine,” says Google’s Conroy. “When you buy sponsored links, or ads, on a search engine, you can often be up and running in under an hour, so you can have your ads showing very quickly. Whereas for SEO, generally it’s a very long-term project, so you may have to spend months or even potentially years making changes to your website and waiting to see if that will improve your results in search engines.”
Another benefit of SEM is that it allows you to control the exact details of the message that the searcher sees.
“With SEO, you can’t always control the page that people are going to end up on. With SEM you can,” says Conroy. “If you have a good understanding of your site, and which pages are likely to lead to something that’s going to cause a profit for the business – like buying something or coming in to visit your store – then SEM is going to give you greater control over that. You can put them in a place on your site where they’re more likely to drive the business’s bottom line.”
“Probably the big advantage with the SEM side of things is the real ability to tailor your marketing message,” explains Craig Somerville, managing director of Reload Media. “If you’ve got a great offer like ‘free delivery’ or ‘overnight shipping’, or if you’ve got a price point on a particular product, then you can get that across to the potential customer as they’re searching for that product, and display it to them in those four lines.”
SEM also allows businesses to set up a very specific way of measuring its return on investment.
“It gets to the point where you can actually track how profitable every single keyword you’re running is,” explains Somerville. “You can also track things like which ad messages are working best. You might find out for instance that free delivery is working better than overnight shipping, or that free gift wrapping is a better offer,” he continues. “So you can actually use SEM as a really good way to A/B split test your marketing messages which can then help drive other marketing strategies as well.”
The practical application that sets SEM apart from SEO is that it allows businesses to target short-term goals like marketing campaigns and promotional offers. Whilst the benefits of it are much more direct and measurable than SEO, explains Google’s Conroy, it shouldn’t be viewed as a replacement.
“We recommend for all businesses, if they’ve got the time and the budget, that they should be looking at both SEM and SEO,” she suggests.
One reason for this is that the cumulative effect of having the top ranking position in both paid and organic search generates more traffic than either would separately. “Let’s say that somebody types in a keyword for Katoomba Accommodation, and your business is actually showing on both the free listings and the paid listings, the clickthrough rate on both will go up, so it’s greater than the sum of its parts, just because you own more real estate on the page,” explains Conroy.
One criticism of using paid search is that most searchers just ignore the sponsored results, automatically blanking them out in favour of the ostensibly more relevant organic listings. Despite this, Conroy insists that the paid links do generate quite a lot of traffic, although the amount depends considerably on the nature of the searcher’s query.
“Say for example someone puts in a query like ‘history of the roman empire’. In that case we wouldn’t expect that many clicks on ads, as it’s not really something that’s commercial in nature,” she explains. “But if we have someone type in ‘car insurance’, then we would actually expect a significant portion of the traffic to go to ads, because people are looking for somethingsthat’s commercial, and the ads are meeting that commercial need, often in a way that the natural search results are not, because they’ll say things like ‘Get a 10 per cent discount if you buy car insurance online’ or something like that.”
Conroy reports that in her personal experience she’s seen clickthrough rates from anywhere between 1-2 per cent up to 50-60 per cent, especially for listings that target brand terms.
On the other hand, Reload’s Somerville has a more specific idea on the exact proportions between SEO and SEM clickthroughs.
“The average split is about 70 per cent SEO and about 30 per cent SEM,” he estimates. “But it depends on the search term. What we’ve found and what a lot of the other articles that have come out have shown is that SEM tends to be used by a more purchase-ready customer.”
Someone who’s at the information-gathering stage of the purchase cycle will probably favour organic listings over the paid results, elaborates Somerville.
“When the person actually gets ready to purchase stage, they’ll get to the point where they type in the exact make or model of the camera that they actually want,” explains Somerville, “and that’s where you’ve got to hit them with the targeted ad saying ‘this is the model you’re looking for, this is the price point, and a great offer like free delivery or guaranteed next day, or whatever it might be; that’s where we often see really good conversion rates on SEM, and that’s where the percentage of people clicking on paid ads actually goes up.”
Given this, many small business owners would no doubt like to know how many searches are commercial, rather than informational, in nature. Google’s Conroy explains that her company is also curious about this information, but has been unable to ascertain the exact figure itself.
“It’s a really tricky thing to do, because you need to discern a user’s intent from a query and often you get queries that could go either way,” explains Conroy. “If somebody’s searching for ‘Lamborghini’, for example, does that mean they want to buy one, or does that that mean they’re just a fan, and they want to read a fan site about other people who have this specific car. We’ve actually had people try and look at it, and we’ve found it hard to discern ourselves.”
See  the .NETT article here

follow mark on Twitter @markbaa

follow First Rate on Twitter @firstrateau

Related Posts:

No responses yet

Mar 23 2011

Do Not Track Features in the Latest Browsers

Published by Rendy under Google Analytics, Other

Browser war: Browser Privacy Feature Face Off

The newest major web browsers all seem to carry advanced Privacy Features designed to reduce a user’s Internet footprint by allowing them to tune down what websites can track.

Internet Explorer 9 provides Tracking Protection, while Mozilla Firefox 4 offers a Do Not Track feature and Google Chrome 10 allows users to add an Opt-Out extension to the browser.

While all three are similarly promoted as privacy features, they are massively different in how they work and how they impact the user experience.

Internet Explorer 9 – Tracking Protection

Internet Explorer 9 - Tracking Protection

This privacy feature in IE9 requires the user to specifically opt out from a list (or lists) of ad networks. The browser will then watch for clickstream tracking and targeted ads coming from the sites/servers/networks in the opt-out list and simply block them. However, where this list(s) will come from is yet to be finalized.

The main concept is that users will have to create their own lists of ad networks they want blocked, or choose from lists compiled by privacy groups. And it will be left up to the users to continually update their IE9 browsers with the latest, most comprehensive lists.

Jonathan Mayer, a Stanford doctorate and law student who is also a research fellow at Stanford’s Center for Internet and Society, says that the IE9’s blocking lists “should at minimum cover the NAI companies and possibly more” – USA Today – Technology Live

Firefox 4 – Do Not Track Feature

Firefox 4 - Do Not Track Feature

When enabled by the user, Firefox’s Do Not Track feature works by inserting a Do Not Track HTTP Header into the request sent to every website you click to requesting no clickstream tracking. This header tells the receiving website(s) that the user would like to opt out of the Online Behavioral Advertising (OBA).

“The idea is to standardize a way of asking people to not track you, and then send that to everyone,” says Mayer. “You’re relying on the honor system for people not to track you.” The Firefox approach is “essentially a universal form of an opt-out cookie that goes along with every request to every ad network. Not just those on the NAI list or other lists.”

As opposed to actively managing opt-out lists, the user can simply turn the feature on to start sending the opt-out request to every server by default.

While this feature is the closest to being ideal in terms of comprehensiveness and ease-of-use, it may still take a few more Federal Trade Commission (FTC) rulings before the concept can work as intended, as the onus is now on the receiving servers to honour the opt-out request while there is still no clear FTC requirements as yet that defines which servers can and cannot track what.

Google Chrome 10 – Opt-Out Browser Extension

Google Chrome 10 - Opt-out Browser Extension

Google Chrome requires the user to install the Opt-Out browser extension as the privacy feature. This browser extension allows users to ask to opt out of being tracked by the Network Advertising Initiative (NAI) members. The participating members then embed a cookie in the user’s browser noting that request.

Upon such request, some NAI members stop tracking the user’s clickstreams while some other members merely stop sending targeted ads to the user and carry on with clickstream tracking. Should the user ever delete his or her cookies — which is wise to do periodically, for security reasons — the NAI’s opt-out cookies get wiped out, too. The primary added functionality of Keep My Opt-Outs is designed to “prevent accidentally clearing those cookies,” says Mayer.

In Summary

To me, after analysing these features in more detail, what has lately generated much hype in the market seems to be a great concept that is currently lacking in execution due to no follow-up regulation to enforce the opt-out requests.  However, in the future this may be resolved to allow the features to function as intended.

What about Web Analytics?

I can see some concerns out there on how these Privacy Features (especially “Do Not Track”) will impact the web analytics tracking.

My estimation is that the above is a misconception and that there should not be any real impact at all to Web Analytics. Here is why:

  1. Rate of usage: Early observations seem to indicate heavy user involvement in setting those features up properly, especially for the Google Chrome browser extension install and IE9’s opt-out list management. This would limit such usage to a minority rather than majority-by-default.
  2. Blockage Target: All the three Privacy Features specifically target 3rd party cookies, which is the type of cookie normally used by the ad networks. There is currently no indication that 1st party cookies are going to be impacted. And since most web analytics (Google Analytics included) use 1st party cookies, the data integrity will very likely remain unaffected by these do not track features.

OTHER SOURCES:

Related Posts:

No responses yet

Mar 15 2011

Google extends Personal Blocklist feature from chrome to its main search results interface

Google blocklist feature

Google has again evolved the personalised search feature to allow users to block domains from the main search results interface without having to install the Personal Blocklist Chrome extension to do so. The way to use this feature is that after a user clicks on one of the links in the search results then presses the back button, an option should appear next to the cached link to allow the user to block the whole domain from all results. This differs slightly from the old search wiki feature that allowed users to drop a page from one particular search query.

Now Google has publicly stated on it’s blog that it does not rely on the feedback it receives from the Personal Blocklist Chrome extension and we would assume this would be the same for feedback from this new feature. This statement was made after they had introduced an algorithm change to provide higher quality results by blocking a lot of the low quality content farms that were around. Google had also stated that they did do a comparison of the domains the new algorithm block to the feedback from the Chrome extension and there was an 84% correlation.

What does this all mean? Even though Google is not automatically using the blocked domain data to influence its search result, they are using it as an early detection system for domains that might be using highly aggressive ranking techniques that Google may deem as breaching its guidelines. So basically users who use personalised search are now part of a bigger quality control panel. Google is also using the blocked domain feedback data as a yardstick for its own algorithm.

Related Posts:

No responses yet

Mar 07 2011

Google Test: Expanding Social Search?

Google Expanding Social Search?

I have to admit, I’ve never been a big fan of Google’s social search. Unless Google knows something about your social network, then the few suggestions it offers are pretty useless. In most cases, Google knows little about you – unless you are one of the three avid Google Buzz users in the world!

Last night I was at home. I was signed in using an account I don’t use very much, mostly used as a spam trap. The account is markbaa AT gmail dot com.

I did a search and was very surprised to see this in the results:

“Want to see which results your friends are talking about? Are you markbaa?”.

That was a link to my twitter profile, offering to link it to my login. Google doesn’t know much about the markbaa gmail account as I rarely use it. So it’s either just lucky guessing – same name, or something super clever.I also use markbaa for my linked in profile and facebook profile. Why didn’t it suggest these as well? Still under development and I stumbled on an early test?

I asked around the First Rate office, no one else had seen this. So either it is a test (more likely), or it has to have a very high confidence threshold before making the recommendation.

If they roll this out en masse, could be that Google Social Search actually becomes useful!

Mark Baartse, Consulting Director, First Rate Australia.

Related Posts:

No responses yet

Next »

 



First Rate on LinkedIn