Archive for the 'Search Engine Marketing' Category

Jan 18 2012

The similarities between SEM and Electronic Direct Marketing (eDM)

When thinking about the relationship between Search Engine Marketing (SEM) and Electronic Direct Marketing (eDM), the first thing that comes to my mind is a scene from Austin Powers where, (bear with me for a moment!), Doctor Evil throws to Austin that very quotable line:

We’re not so different you and I

This is true between SEM and eDM also!

SEM and eDM are more similar than different, including being different portals with a common goal or objective.

There are several key similarities between the attributes of effective SEM and effective eDM.

1.    Both operate in challenging environments.

Paid ads exist in an environment where there is a lot of information to compete against, so ads have to be clever and work to get the user’s attention.  Email is not quite the same, the user is in automatic mode as opposed to an engaged mode, but eDMs also have to be clever and to work to get the reader’s attention.  There’s little difference between fighting to get the attention of an engaged user against competing ads and information, and fighting to get the attention of semi-disengaged user against other emails and lifestyle factors.  The best strategy is one that works for both: short and high impact…

2.    Both work best when kept sharp

Paid Search ads have no choice but to be succinct and high-impact.  E-mail marketing doesn’t have the same restrictions, but it could work better if it did.  Often, the best performing eDMs are akin to best performing SEM ads – simple, concise, and high-impact.

3.    A strong singular theme works best.

Paid Search ads work best when they stick to a singular theme – that’s a given in the world of SEM.  Likewise, eDMs usually work best when they too stick to a singular theme, and convey this with quick impact much like a paid ad does.  If you have more than one theme or uncomplimentary themes it is best to split these up into separate eDMs or separate ad groups.

4.    Same Attributes/Elements, or Building Blocks

Catchy heading, Engaging copy, easy link to a website.  Sound familiar?  It doesn’t just optimise Paid Search ads, but eDMs too.  An eDM’s subject line is like a paid ad’s headline, the body copy is like a paid ad’s description lines, and text buttons like a paid ad’s display URL.  E-mail marketing just has the luxury of being able to utilise a few more elements, most notably images and multiple URLs.  Its structure though can essentially be seen as a more developed paid ad.

5.    Drive click-throughs and conversions

Both paid ads and eDMs essentially share the same core three objectives, either to drive: impressions (exposure), clicks, or conversions.  Both formats are to be clicked by the viewer, and to take the viewer to the website to complete some type of action.  The two channels just go about this through different media, but utilising common attributes effectively.

6.    Both benefit from testing

Paid Search ads are an on-going marketing initiative, whereas eDMs are generally one-off, so paid ads have the advantage of constant testing that eDMs don’t.  An eDM can and should have its ‘subject line plus sender name’ combination tested for large database sends.  Here, several combinations are formulated, and a given number of emails are sent out using each combination.  Whichever subject line and sender name has the best results is used to send the large remainder of the send.  This is important, because subject line and sender name is the first contact a user has with the eDM, and determines whether the email is opened or not.  Even a modest improvement can translate into a massive performance increase in large-scale sends.

7.    Segmentation

Both Paid Search ads and eDMs can, and should, use some degree of segmentation to increase return on investment.  Paid Search ads do this through account and campaign settings and keywords, whereas eDMs use database filters.  Either way, they’re different ways of accomplishing the common task of reaching the most relevant target audience.

Similarities abound, but what should be taken away is that search engine marketers unwittingly know more about electronic direct marketing than is realised.  In fact, an SEM specialist’s contribution to an eDM campaign would be valuable in keeping the communication strong and performance-focused and results-driven.

Likewise, an Electronic Direct Marketer can understand SEM as a similar product to email marketing, just much simpler and on-going.

So next time someone talks SEM or eDM, have the confidence of knowing that the two areas are fundamentally very similar.  So whichever of these challenges you’re facing, there’s no doubt that you’ll have what it takes to save the day; much like the international man of mystery himself!

Related Posts:

No responses yet

Oct 05 2011

Google Tweaking AdWords Quality Score Calculation Algorithm

Published by Mike under Search Engine Marketing

AdWords quality score changes

This week Google announced that they are rolling out changes globally to the way AdWords Quality Score is calculated.

What is AdWords Quality Score?

Most people who have had even a cursory look at Google AdWords understand that it operates on a Cost Per Click (CPC) basis, and if an advertiser is prepared to spend more money for each click they receive, their ads are more likely to be shown at higher positions, and are therefore more likely to be clicked on by searchers. What is less well understood is that it is not just your maximum CPC bid that determines the ranking order of different advertisements – the other major factor is Quality Score.

Why would Google care about the quality of the advertisements they show – surely they should just show the ads that will make them the most money? Well that might work well in the short term, but if this was how it worked, spammy advertisers would be able to make their ads for porn or gambling sites show up regardless of what searchers were actually looking for, which would pretty quickly annoy a lot of searchers, and convince them to stop using Google and look for a better search engine.

As an AdWords advertiser, every time someone does a search that matches one of your keywords, your quality score for that keyword is calculated. The three main factors that determine quality score are:

  • Clickthrough Rate (CTR) – based on previous historical evidence, what percentage of searchers for this keyword choose to click on your ad.
  • Relevance – how relevant is the keyword to the ad text you have, as well as other relevance factors such as geographical relevance.
  • Landing Page Quality:
    • How relevant is the content on your ad’s landing page to the search query?
    • Is your content original or are there hundreds of other sites with the same information?
    • Does your site load quickly?
    • Do you annoy your visitors with lots of pop-up or pop-under advertisements?
    • Is your website easy to navigate around?

How Have the Quality Score Calculations Changed?

Basically the weighting of relevance and landing page quality have been increased. This will make it harder for advertisers to achieve high ad positions for keywords that are not highly relevant to their websites, and should help to improve the quality of the ads that Google users see when they do a search.

And don’t forget that Google announced September 21 that mobile optimized websites have started to factor into landing page quality (and thus Quality Score) also.

Do you need help optimising AdWords campaigns for your business? First Rate is a Google AdWords Certified Partner with years of experience managing AdWords campaigns for many of Australasia’s leading businesses. New AdWords functionality is added all the time and it’s therefore important to have people who know their stuff working on your account! Contact Us.

Related Posts:

No responses yet

Sep 23 2011

Don’t Bet the Farm On It – AdWords Campaign Experiments (ACE)

Published by Daniel under Search Engine Marketing

The Adwords Campaign Experiments tool (also known as ACE) was originally released as a beta in early June 2010. Now that the tool has been tested and implemented into the Google Adwords interface for some time, we felt it was appropriate to share some best practices on its uses and provide an overview of how it works.

For those of you not already familiar with the tool, it presents an alternative to the traditional PPC Marketing approach of making best practice changes to the account first, then comparing the results (before and after) later on.

How it Works

ACE allows you to make Ad Group level changes to elements of your account (including keywords, bids, Ad Groups, ads and placements) then split test these alongside the originals i.e. the versions before your new changes were made.

You can specify the amount of traffic you want your control group vs. new group to receive (we recommend sticking to the default 50:50 option to keep post-experiment calculations straight-forward), and also the length of time that you want the experiment to run for. In order to achieve statistically significant results you’ll want the experiment to run for at least one month, however smaller accounts may benefit from a longer time period.

At the end of the specified experimental period AdWords will display all of the associated metrics including the degree of statistical significance the results have brought about.

The screen shot below shows where you can set up the campaign experiment – under the Settings tab for a given campaign.

Why use ACE?

In short – to minimise your risk.

Most AdWords accounts do eventually get to the point where the best practice playbook has been exhausted and squeezing out additional profitability (or even maintaining it in the face of tough competition) requires a degree of aptly labelled “experimentation” in sensible doses!

The Results

Depending on your goals for the experiment, some of the metrics provided may excite you more than others. For example, a decrease in impressions while maintaining the same level of clicks is a good result if your aim is to improve the Click Through Rate (CTR).

Within the Adwords interface, ACE uses coloured icons to summarise statistical significance. A grey up-down icon represents that a metric has not changed by a statistically significant amount during the course of the experiment. Upward or downward pointing arrows are used to show that a metric has increased or decreased by a statistically significant amount.

The degree of statistical confidence is broken down further for this group as follows:

  • One arrow pointing upwards or downwards represents a 95% statistical likelihood that the change seen in the metric has not occurred by chance
  • Two arrows pointing upwards or downwards represents a 99% statistical likelihood
  • Three arrows pointing upwards or downwards represents a 99.9% statistical likelihood

In the example screenshot provided below, a statistically significant decrease in impressions has been experienced (represented by the three downward pointing arrows in the impressions column of the experiment row). Conversely the Clicks, CTR, Avg. CPC and Cost columns show grey up-down icons, representing that these metrics have not changed by a statistically significant amount.

Adwords Campaign Experiment screenshot

We’d like to hear about your experiences using the Adwords Campaign Experiments feature. Please post your anecdotes in the comments section below.

Related Posts:

No responses yet

Aug 04 2011

Recent Google AdWords Ad Changes and Improvements

Published by Premek under Search Engine Marketing

While the basic principles behind AdWords have remained unchanged for years, a lot of quite significant changes in the appearance and format of ads have occurred in the last couple of months. Below we’ll take a brief look at these.

Extended Headline

Ads displaying in the premium positions (positions 1-3) can append the first description line to the ad headline. This can make the ad message stand out more, and if an ad is well written the impact on CTR can be significant. AdWords puts a hyphen between the original headline and the appended first description line. It is therefore important to make sure your ad message makes sense even after this feature is applied :-)

Domain Name in Headline

The site domain name can appear in the headline of your ad. Again, the ad must be ranked in the premium position.

Well known websites and big brands can benefit from this because their ads will become more distinguished from the others. On the contrary, ads with dodgy looking domain names and sites which advertise everything can experience drops in CTR.

One could argue whether it makes sense to have both the domain name and the display URL in the ad, given that the information is duplicated. But since this is only a testing feature how it works could change, or it could disappear altogether.

AdWords +1 Button

+ Button on an AdWords Ad

Users can rate the ads by giving them +1’s – Google’s recent social feature. The number of received +1’s does not directly affect Quality Score but the idea is that users are more likely to click an ad if they see that the ad received +1’s from their friends. However, I don’t expect this feature to have any visible impact on an account performance in the near future.

Display URL Position

New Positioning of Display URL

The visible URL line was moved from the bottom of the ad to directly underneath the headline. This change is for all ads, not only those in the premium positions. The appearance of the organic search results has also changed in the same way.

Snippets from Landing Page Content

This is probably the most recent change we’ve spotted: AdWords can append a snippet from the landing page content (especially from the meta description element) as part of the ad description. In this way AdWords ads can thus have a description of up to 70 characters long.

Page Content Snippet in an AdWords Ad

Have you spotted this in you ads too? Do you know of some other new ad appearance changes? Please let us know in the comments.

Related Posts:

No responses yet

May 26 2011

metservice.com SEM Case Study

SEM Case Study - MetService.com

MetService, together with their international commercial subsidiary, Metra, is a global leader in providing relevant, timely and accurate weather information services, benefitting billions of people throughout the world.

metservice.com is New Zealand’s 6th most popular website according to Nielsen NetRatings (Market Intelligence Ranking, April 2011). First Rate has been providing hands-on pay per click search advertising optimisation for a number of years, working closely with their online team to generate maximum impact.

Download the SEM case study.

Related Posts:

No responses yet

Next »

 



First Rate on LinkedIn